top of page
Image de engin akyurt

Packaging Regulation
2026-2030

NEW REGULATION - THE COUNTDOWN HAS BEGUN

From August 12, 2026, all packaging stakeholders in Europe will face the combined impact of PPWR, SUPD, PFAS, and EUDR. For many industrialists, processors, importers, and distributors, these are still "distant" acronyms. Yet, between 2026 and 2030, these texts will decisively determine which materials exit the market, which become 10 to 35% more expensive, and which gain market share.

 

This page has a simple goal: to provide a clear and operational vision of what will disappear, what will surge, and what will remain in packaging (both food and non-food) in Europe, so you can anticipate the impact on your references, margins, and supplies... instead of enduring it.

Key Effective Date

12

AUGUST

2026

Profy Countdown Timer: Visible on Live site

NEW REGULATION - THE COUNTDOWN HAS BEGUN

2026-2030
the silent big bang of packaging materials in Europe

From August 2026 to 2030, the European packaging materials market will experience the biggest regulatory shake-up in its history… and a significant portion of the industry has yet to grasp its full extent.

PPWR, SUPD, REACH/PFAS, and EUDR are not "just more texts." Together, they orchestrate one simple thing: forced circularity, with a brutal sorting between materials that stay and those that exit the game.

Concretely, this means for all packaging stakeholders (food and non-food, paper, plastic, thermoformed, multilayer, import, distribution):

part of the current offering will mechanically drop to zero in Europe,

another part will see its costs rise by 10 to 35%

new materials and models will take their place, with very clear winners

This page aims to lay all the cards on the table, without jargon, for all those who "have heard about PPWR" without grasping its concrete consequences on their references, margins, and supplies.

Minerya Offers a Mineral Sheet

Minerya Offers a Mineral Sheet

What is destined to disappear or be marginalised

Non-mono-material or solely fibre multi-layered, with non-recyclable chemical barriers

(PE + aluminium + paper, PET + PE inseparable, complex barrier films)

All packaging with detectable PFAS

beyond thresholds

(25 ppb individual, 250 ppb total, 50 ppm overall)

Rigid single-use plastic or films

under 60 µm that are non-reusable

Virgin paper without EUDR-compliant forest traceability

PFAS.jpg
hand-holding-recycle-symbol.jpg

What will grow significantly

Mono-material fibre (100% recyclable paper/cardboard) or mono-plastic (rPET, rPP) with proven recyclability

Reusable or deposit solutions, and certified industrial compostables

Bio-based materials or those with a high recycled content

Optimised formats, with material reduction and reuse logic

Food packaging

A simplified but much more demanding market

From August 12, 2026, all segments of food packaging are affected simultaneously

Unseparable multi-layers become progressively unacceptable

(PPWR, minimum recyclability of 70% by 2030)

PFAS disappear from greaseproof papers and food thermoforms, under immediate threat of ban

Single-use rigid plastics and light films are reduced by the SUPD and replaced by reusable or mono recyclable

All virgin fibre must be traceable to the plot level (EUDR), under threat of blockage

Very concrete consequences on final products

Products in decline or dropping >70 %

Multi-layer vacuum bags for ham and charcuterie

PS (and expanded PS) trays for cheeses, desserts, snacks

Classic multi-layer stretch films

PFAS greaseproof papers for caterers and fast food

Aluminium + PE wrap film, multi-layer blisters for fruits, pizza boxes with plastic windows

Classic PS yoghurt pots

vacuum-packed-sausage-coppa-sliced-salami-set-old-dark-wooden-table-background-top-view-fl
tasty-yogurt-plastic-glass-colored-table-place-insert-text.jpg

Products in strong progression

Packaging films for meats and caterers in unbleached paper, with bio-based coating

Meat trays in recycled PET (rPET) and recycled PP (rPP), 100% recyclable

Egg and fruit trays in reinforced moulded pulp

Yoghurt pots in recycled rPP or rPET

Pizza boxes in 100% recycled cardboard

Recyclable mono-PE snack bags, glass jars with deposits, reusable cloths for caterers

The 2030 landscape is clear

about 60% mono-fibre

25%

recycled mono-plastic

15% reusable/deposit

solutions

Minerya-Mock Up.jpg
Minerya-Mock Up.jpg

What this implies for
an industrialist, processor, distributor

Discover a material that remains and is favoured by the 2026-2030 regulations

Imports 

End of the low-cost finished product paradise

August 12, 2026, also marks a major turning point for packaging imports into the EU

Two simple rules

Any imported finished product must be fully compliant with PPWR, PFAS, SUPD, and EUDR upon entry into the territory

The importer or first market entrant bears 100% responsibility, with immediate blockage, destruction, or return, and fines of up to 4% of turnover in case of non-compliance

EU Europe flag regulation.webp
Conteneurs d'expédition empilés

In practice

40 to 55% of finished products currently imported from Asia (especially multi-layered, PS, PFAS, complex films) risk being blocked or gradually phased out

"Complex finished product" flows will collapse in favour of "raw materials + finishing in Europe" flows

What will remain under very strong import pressure

PFAS greaseproofs, multi-layer barrier films, PS and multi-layer thermoformed, oxo-degradable or composite tarpaulins, complex plasticised snack bags, plasticised tracing papers, luxury virgin cardboard cases without EUDR with plastic windows

Image de Agenlaku Indonesia
white-carton-packages-bottles-liquid.jpg

What will, on the contrary, become standard

Recycled or traceable virgin pulp (with EUDR compliance), rPET/rPP/rHDPE/PLA pellets, base PET/PP sheets without coating, non-coated cardboard/paper reels, bio granules (PHA, starch)

Finishing (extrusion, thermoforming, coating, conversion) performed in Europe, to secure compliance and traceability

Result

Actors with transformation capacities in Europe will absorb a massive share of the value, while models based solely on importing finished products from Asia will potentially lose 30 to 60% of their volumes.

Minerya-Mock Up.jpg
Minerya-Mock Up.jpg

What this implies for
an industrialist, processor, distributor

Discover a material that remains and is favoured by the 2026-2030 regulations

Prices & margins
Where is the real cost of materials going?

The regulatory transition comes at a price, at least initially.

Between 2026 and 2028, food and non-food packaging should experience

An average increase of 18 to 28% in B2B prices, linked to reformulations, PFAS audits, EUDR certifications, and the shift to mono-material

Then, stabilisation, or even slight decreases in the major winning families, thanks to economies of scale

Three clear trends emerge.

Products exiting the market

(price → 0 product available in the EU)

PFAS greaseproofs, multi-layer barrier films, multi-layer PS thermoforms, oxo-degradable/multi-layer tarpaulins, classic plastic condiment sachets, plasticised menus, paper + aluminium + PE composites

→ About 25 to 35% of the current market disappears or is entirely recomposed between the end of 2026 and the end of 2027.

Analyse du graphique financier
glass-bottle-with-blue-liquid.jpg

Products that remain but at a higher cost

Minerya Offers a Mineral Sheet

Reformulated bio-coated greaseproof papers

→ +25 to +35%

Virgin cardboards shifting to 100% recycled or bio-coated 

→ +20 to +30%

PET thermoforms to mono-rPET 

→ +20 to +35%

Luxury cases in premium mono-recycled cardboard

→  +10 to +25%

Tracing papers to 100% recycled or nanocellulose

→ +10 to +20%

Products that may remain stable or decrease

Mono-rPET and rPP for thermoforms

→ stability, or -5 to -10% with the rise of recycled content

Moulded pulp

→ stable prices or slight decline with volume

Naturally unbleached papers already compliant

 → limited increase (+5 to +10%)

Machine8.jpg

At the portfolio level, the most sensitive cost items will be

PFAS substitution → bio-coating

+0.35 to 0.65 €/kg

Multi-layer → mono shift

+0.40 to 0.90 €/kg

EUDR certification and PFAS tests

+0.10 to 0.25 €/kg, amortisable over volume

Implementation of reusable/deposit solutions

significant CAPEX, but per-use cost reduced by 30 to 60% in the medium term

What this implies for an industrialist, processor, distributor

For a B2B actor, this shift is not just an "RSE" or "compliance" issue.

It is an immediate business issue

Real risk of disruption or blockage on 20 to 35% of current references

Regulatory and financial exposure in case of maintaining inseparable multi-layers or residual PFAS

Cost increase on certain ranges, but opportunity to regain 15 to 30% market share in segments where competitors react too late

dynamic-data-visualization-3d.jpg
dynamic-digital-network-backdrop-with-pulsing-lines.jpg

Concrete steps to take now

Map references 

identify, for each family, what is mono, multi-layer, PFAS, non-traceable virgin fibre, finished import, etc.

Classify by 2026-2030 risk

what will disappear, what needs heavy and costly reformulation, what is already compliant.

Shift purchases to "raw materials

+ finishing EU" flows to secure PPWR, PFAS, and EUDR

Work from 2026 with converters on mono-material, reusable, or high-recycled-content alternatives.

Conclusion:
the market is not shrinking, it is recomposing

European packaging will not "collapse" with PPWR, SUPD, PFAS, and EUDR. It is fundamentally recomposing around one principle: real, measurable, and controllable circularity.

Companies that simply wait for the final decrees to "adjust a technical sheet" take a direct risk on their volumes, margins, and, ultimately, their licence to operate.

Those who use these four years to:

Audit the recyclability of their portfolios

Substitute PFAS

Secure EUDR traceability

Shift from imported finished products to raw materials finished in Europe

will be the players who have gained market share in 2030 while others were still trying to save their multi-layers.

And now, what to do concretely between 2026 and 2030?

If you are an industrialist, processor, or distributor, the real question is no longer "will these texts pass?" but "which product families in my portfolio will disappear, increase in cost, or remain favoured?".

In practice, the 4 priority movements to engage are:

1

Map your packaging portfolio

Identify, family by family, what is:

mono-material / inseparable multi-layer

with / without PFAS

EUDR-traceable virgin fibre / non-traceable

finished import / raw material

+ finishing EU

Classify your references by 2026-2030 risk

2

Distinguish

what is destined to disappear or be banned

what requires heavy and costly reformulation

what is already aligned with PPWR, PFAS, SUPD, and EUDR

3

Secure your supply chains

Reduce your dependence:

And gradually shift towards "raw materials + transformation in Europe" flows

on complex multi-layers

on PFAS

on non-traceable virgin fibres

on sensitive finished product imports from Asia

4

Integrate now "2030 winning materials

Test and introduce mono-material

mono-material

recyclable

greaseproof/waterproof solutions

compatible with food contact

and out of regulatory grey areas

These are the materials that will remain available, stable, and competitive once regulatory sorting has taken effect.

What this implies for an industrialist, processor, distributor

It is an immediate business issue

A mono-material sheet designed to meet PPWR, PFAS, SUPD, and EUDR requirements

Replace certain at-risk references without waiting until 2029.

Minerya-Mock Up.jpg

This simplified summary has been prepared by our company. Panibag SAS cannot guarantee its completeness or the accuracy of its interpretation.

For the exact obligations, please refer to the official texts and the sources below.
 

Sources

Find the original sources and the full regulations via the following links:

bottom of page